a life update / some videos

Last night I told my friend Sean that I was editing video of a performance by the ensemble I’d co-founded. I guess I hadn’t told him about Bonn Feier, because he was surprised and wanted to know what we did. This made me realize that I’ve been relatively quiet about all the fun things we’ve been doing over the past year, so I thought I’d bring all my non-Bloomington friends up to speed about this business. I also did finish editing a couple of videos, so I wanted to share those as well.

(If you don’t want to read my blabbering and just came to watch some videos, okay, fine, click here.)

First of all, I always feel that I’m using “ensemble” pretty loosely. I guess we’ve earned that status at this point, since we had a real life concert about two weeks ago, along with a couple of side performances (one at a John Cage centennial celebration, where we performed a piece we collectively wrote involving homemade fortune cookies, and another more loosely affiliated event just yesterday, which I’ll get to in a minute). But we’ve been developing to this point for about a year. Bonn Feier started when my friend Paula had the idea to apply for an on-campus grant that would allow us to put on a performance of Pauline Oliver’s 1976 piece Bonn Feier, which we had encountered in Phil Ford’s Fall 2011 “Process Music” class. We performed Bonn Feier last year, in the middle of the madness of IU’s Little 500. (As a note: This year’s Little 500 is happening this weekend, making it our approximate one-year anniversary!) Then the next fall, Paula (who had the idea to apply for the grant that allowed us to put on Bonn Feier) and I decided to organize a group that would meet about every week and read through similar types of pieces and scores to Bonn Feier and others that we had encountered in the class–pieces that not everyone might recognize as music, although they often have sonic elements, because they are very dependent on the individual or collective experience of the performers rather than on the presentation of rehearsed musical material to an audience. So Bonn Feier (named after the piece that started it all) essentially began as a reading group, albeit a very experiential one.

We decided that we wanted to have some sort of performance, and the Technologies of Experience Symposium that Phil and Dawna Schuld from the Art History department at IU were organizing seemed like a good time to do it. So Paula and I started getting everything worked out…and then I realized that I had agreed to produce a live commentary on IU’s production of Falstaff on the same night we had planned for the concert. But that was okay. I did whatever I could to help out, came to dress rehearsals, and was generally annoying, I’m sure.

Here’s the program from the concert:waiting for the gong program

We had a really good variety, and both the first and last pieces on the program proper involved audience participation. The two at the bottom were more like installations; for the Stomping Piece, we set up various materials for people to step, hop, and stomp on. For the Poem, we had notecards set out for people to write individual words on and create a collective work of poetry.

I’ve uploaded two of the pieces to YouTube. I’m sorry for the poor video quality–it’s the best I could do with the source material–but hopefully the audio and the excellent performances make up for it. The two pieces are also probably the most similar of the concert, but they’re also the best suited to watching in video form.

The first piece is R. Murray Schafer’s Hear Me Out. You may know Schafer as someone who’s written a lot about acoustic ecology (or you may not, that’s cool too; the gist is that he’s concerned with noise pollution and with the particular qualities of local soundscapes), but he’s also a composer. Performing on this piece are Nathan, Laura, Paula, and Michael.

The second piece is Toby Lurie’s Sound Composition for Six. Here we have Laura, Liz, Nathan, Paula, Michael, and Gabe.

Finally, a quick note about the awesome thing that happened this past Friday. Bonn Feier had wanted to do a performance of A. M. Fine’s Piece for Fluxorchestra, in which performers are planted in an audience and begin to engage in all sorts of disruptive behavior, but we couldn’t think of a good opportunity to put it on this semester. Liz suggested that it might work if we performed it in M402, a lecture-style undergraduate music history course, on a day she was to lead the lecture. I’ll admit, I was a little skeptical at first, but my doubts went away as we put everything together (her way more than me, although I did get to help assign parts, which was really fun!). We (again mostly Liz, I’m not trying to steal her thunder here) got all sorts of people involved–students from her discussion section; the other AIs (associate instructors, IU’s term for teaching assistants) for the class, and Halina Goldberg, the course instructor; people from Phil’s seminar this semester; and participants in Bonn Feier, including Laura’s mom, who was in town for the weekend.

Liz started off the class by announcing the topic of her lecture (Varèse, Babbitt, and Cage) and promptly sitting down in the first row of seats–our cue to begin the piece. One of the next actions, after a minute had passed, was Dr. Goldberg standing up and exclaiming, “I was planted here as part of the performance, and as such, I refuse to perform!” She then left the hall. And all hell pretty much broke loose from there. Way too many events happen throughout the piece for me to recount them all, but it involved balloons being blown up and released or popped, Laura running around the hall being disruptive, and inaccurate excursuses on the nature of the fugue.

My favorite moment, though, actually happened before the piece had gotten into full swing. Two students sitting behind me had been talking to each other before class began, wondering if they were going to have a quiz (the AIs each told their students they really wouldn’t want to miss class that day, without revealing what was going to happen). When Liz sat down after announcing the title of the lecture, one turned to the other and said, “Is she really doing 4’33″? I can’t believe she’s doing 4’33″.” Well, no, not quite, as was clear within the next couple of minutes, but she was using it as an intellectual lead-in to explain how some of Cage’s ideas had been taken up by later composers, so close enough.

miscellany 9/18/12

Item of Interest #1: I nearly wrote a post about Amanda Palmer and how ridiculous her recent request for free performers at her shows was. It was to have the words “oh hell no” in the title, and would have featured a lengthy analogy to a hypothetical long-lost friend asking you (as a semi-professional musician) out of the blue if you could perform at her upcoming wedding. For free. Oh, and could you provide a resume so that she would know you’re legit? (I actually did finish this part of the post, and it is a beautiful piece of satirical, rage-filled writing, so I hope that more pop/rock musicians follow in Amanda’s path so that I have a chance to publish it. No, I don’t hope that, actually.) Read more

sean burns, composer

My good friend Sean O. G. Burns just published his website, and I’d like to take this opportunity to make you aware of it.

If you happened to be anywhere near the University of South Carolina School of Music in the past several years, I don’t know how you could have missed Sean. Maybe you’re just accustomed to seeing long-haired, mandolin- or guitar-toting dudes who rarely seem to leave the second-floor canteen, I don’t know. At any rate, you may have heard about the guy who was writing a piece about that 911 phone call where the lady had her face ripped off by a chimp. Or you may have been in attendance at the composition department recital when he yelled at the audience through a megaphone in front of a jazz combo, then proceeded to Rickroll us. There’s also his choral setting of a Sara Teasdale poem that’s been run through online translators until barely recognizable and the piano fugue that begins fairly tamely and devolves into total madness. But although Sean’s pieces tend to be inspired by some sort of hair-brained scheme, they always go way beyond the concepts that inspired them. The truth is that Sean’s music is always provocative, highly individual, and just plain fun to listen to. For those of you who haven’t been lucky enough to hear live performances of Sean’s pieces in person–or those who just need a refresher course–may I suggest checking out Sean’s Soundcloud, which has all sorts of delightful samples of his work including most of the pieces I mentioned above.

I think Sean’s intending to make some changes to the site in the near future, but in the meantime take a look, read his amazing bio (which I may or may not have had something to do with; sorry, town of Laurens, but you ARE home to the infamous Redneck Shop), follow his Soundcloud, send him some love via email, consider contacting him about purchasing a score if you’re into that thing…I’m also betting he wouldn’t say no to commissions. Hey, it’s worth a shot, I never know who’s going to read these posts.

what i’m listening to – michael hearst, songs for unusual creatures

I heard about this album on NPR this morning when I was driving to the grocery store. It’s like a drugged-out Carnival of the Animals. (Except also ostensibly informational and kid-oriented.)

I know it’s supposed to be kids’ music, but I kind of love what I’m hearing and might need to buy this. It’s just a great collection of unusual sounds including the glass armonica, theremin, and daxophone. Also, each piece seems fairly short and musically concise, which is well-suited to my miniscule musical attention span.

Glass armonica

That’s a real-life glass armonica, folks. (Photo courtesy of my brother from the Muziekinstrumentenmuseum in Brussels; better quality picture of the same instrument at the link above!)

A Soundcloud playlist of samples is available here. More info about the album is here.

 

computational musicology

I just came across this article about computational musicology, which is a field of musical analysis that uses software to search for trends across large quantities of music. The main impact of this research on the general public is the improvement of music engines’ ability to recommend songs that the listener might enjoy based on past habits, though there are a few other oddities such as apps that can identify recorded music (Shazam, et al.), plot the decibel levels of songs to show their buildup to climaxes, and even guess whether or not a click track was used when the song was recorded.

I found one part of the article especially amusing:

Using Music21, which was designed by Michael Cuthbert and his MIT colleague Christopher Ariza, Harvard physics doctoral student Douglas Mason analyzed Beatles songs, running more than 100 of them under the microscope and discovering that the majority of them were built around one—and only one—highly unexpected chord. “You expect C to appear in a song in the key of C, but you wouldn’t expect a chord that almost never appears in a song in C, like E flat, because it’s really out of key. But the Beatles did stuff like that all the time,” said Mason. “They’ll have a song in major but they’ll bring in a chord from the minor key, and that chord will act as an anchor for the whole song.”

I’m amused because my boyfriend, Brad, made this exact same observation in a conversation about songwriting only a few days ago. He didn’t have to convert Beatles songs to code and run them through analytical software. He’s just listened enough, played enough, and has a good enough ear to be able to figure out that the main element that gives a chord progression that characteristic Beatles sound is well-placed mode mixture. (Mode mixture, for the music theory uninitiated, is the term that describes what Mason was talking about in the excerpt above. Basically, it’s the use of a chord that wouldn’t normally appear in a normal major or minor key; if the piece is in the minor mode, the chord can be borrowed from a related major mode, or vice versa.)

I’m sure Brad’s not alone in making this observation; in fact, I’d be willing to bet there’s already published scholarly research that mentions the trend. Of course, it takes a lot more work to actually prove–statistically rather than intuitively–that this was the case across the entirety of the Beatles’ output. That’s where the computers come in.

I’m in no way opposed to this concept, and I think it’s funny that the article assumes a lot of people within the field of musicology would be, or that it would be considered “antithetical to the spirit of the humanities.” It seems to provide concrete substantiation for factors that could be independently observed and explained, and (as one of the researchers points out) it’s entirely possible for a machine to find connections that any human might miss. At any rate, it seems to me that the most interesting research about music focuses not on what happens but why it happens, so I think I’ll reserve my vitriolic anti-technological ranting for when a computer is able to reproduce that aspect of human thought.

quick update and big plans

Just wanted to share this Forbes magazine article along the lines of my gimmick posts (part 1, part 2). It’s about pop duo Karmin‘s rise to fame using a targeted strategy involving Billboard Top 40 covers, search engine optimization (SEO), and absolutely no cursing so as not to put off potential sponsors.

I realize that I never published my last post on gimmicks–the most fun of all, because I’m talking about contemporary composers!–and I’m definitely planning to do so. Brad and I had also been working on something else related to this subject, so that’s possibly still in the works as well. It might take a while, but hopefully I’ll get it done eventually.

bonn feier

At the end of last semester, my friend and fellow IU musicology student Paula had the idea of applying for funding from IU’s Arts Week Everywhere to put on Pauline Oliveros’s instruction score Bonn Feier. The piece (pronounce it like “bonfire,” with a bit of a German accent if you like) has two main premises. One, it draws attention to the sounds of the campus or city in which it is being performed. Two, it aims to gradually take over the campus or city with strange activities:

The intention of BONN FEIER is to gradually and subtly, subvert perception so that normal activity seems as strange or displaced as any of the special activities. Thus the whole city or campus becomes a theater, and all of its inhabitants, players.

We came across this piece as a part of a class we took last semester with Professor Phil Ford. The class was entitled Process Music, and its contents are somewhat difficult to describe; the way that I’ve come to generally explain the title to people is that in the music we discussed and performed, the process of enacting the piece is just as important–if not more important–as any actual music or sound that results from the performance. This is music that is intended to be experiential, and that means it takes a variety of forms that don’t always really approach what we normally think of as musical performance. Bonn Feier definitely falls under that category; although there’s a sonic or ecoacoustic element, there’s also a good deal of performing that may not seem to have anything to do with music. More on this later, though!

Early this semester as the funding deadline approached, Paula sent out an email to all of the students from our class asking if they’d be interested in participating or helping with organization. I volunteered to help fill out the application and help with planning and logistics if we actually got the money. To that end, Arts Week claimed that they were looking for unusual performances, but we weren’t sure they wanted something this unusual. Our budget included four African log drums, several piñatas, wood and supplies to make our own totem pole, and a generous costume budget which included a gorilla suit rental. The piece also culminates in a bonfire, and although it would be acceptable to have some sort of non-fire alternative, we wanted the real thing.

In spite of our worries, we got all of the money we asked for, and so we began figuring out how exactly we were going to put things together. I won’t bore you with all of the details that went into our planning, but let’s just say that organizing an entire day’s worth of activities AND trying to get permission to hold an open fire on IU’s campus AND reserving the space in which to do it AND buying all of the equipment necessary to pull it off was not an easy task.

Fast forward to yesterday, April 21, the day of the performance and also–completely coincidentally, as we’d originally planned to perform the piece on the 14th–the day of IU’s infamous Little 500 bicycle race. (The Wikipedia article fails to mention the copious partying that traditionally accompanies the event.)

Read more

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers